Kevin O’Leary has spent more than four decades building companies, investing in entrepreneurs and telling people exactly what he thinks about their money.
Advertisement
But one of the most important lessons he says he learned about success has almost nothing to do with investing.
It came from Steve Jobs.
And according to O’Leary, the idea is surprisingly simple:
You only need to accomplish three important things each day.
Everything else?
Noise.
O’Leary Says Most People Are Focusing on the Wrong Things
Modern working life is filled with distractions.
Emails arrive constantly.
Phones vibrate.
Meetings consume hours.
Social media competes for attention.
And people can finish an exhausting day feeling as though they were busy for ten hours without actually accomplishing the things that mattered.
O’Leary believes this is one of the biggest differences between ordinary performers and highly successful founders.
Speaking recently on the Build or Break podcast, the Canadian businessman explained that he tries to identify three genuinely important objectives for each day.
Those come first.
Anything preventing him from completing them is treated as noise.
It sounds almost absurdly simple.
But O’Leary says it took an encounter with one of the most famous entrepreneurs in history for him to understand how powerful the principle could be.
The Lesson Came From Steve Jobs
O’Leary’s connection with Jobs dates back to the 1990s.
At the time, O’Leary was building SoftKey Software Products, which eventually became The Learning Company.
His company was involved in educational software for Apple.
O’Leary recalled suggesting that Jobs listen to students and teachers to understand what they wanted from the software.
Jobs wasn’t particularly interested.
According to O’Leary’s recollection, Jobs believed Apple needed to maintain control over the vision rather than allow outside opinions to dictate what it created.
O’Leary initially found the approach difficult.
Eventually, however, he came to see something underneath it.
Jobs had an extraordinary ability to distinguish between information that mattered and information that did not.
O’Leary Calls It “Signal to Noise”
That distinction became central to the way O’Leary thinks about productivity.
He describes it as the ratio between signal and noise.
Signal is whatever directly contributes to the objective.
Noise is everything competing for attention without meaningfully advancing it.
O’Leary believes Jobs operated at something close to an 80/20 ratio — an unusually intense focus on signal.
That could make Jobs extremely difficult to work with, O’Leary acknowledged.
But he also believes that same characteristic contributed to what Jobs accomplished.
There is an uncomfortable element to that philosophy.
Extreme focus does not necessarily make someone pleasant.
And O’Leary doesn’t pretend otherwise.
He Sees the Same Quality in Elon Musk
O’Leary says he has witnessed a similar mentality in Elon Musk.
He recalled encountering Musk socially at Shark Tank producer Mark Burnett’s Christmas parties.
If Musk decided a conversation was not providing anything useful, according to O’Leary, he could simply leave.
Socially awkward?
Perhaps.
O’Leary sees something else.
He sees someone refusing to spend a limited resource — time — on something he has already decided does not matter.
That distinction reveals quite a lot about O’Leary’s own philosophy.
“I Don’t Care”
O’Leary has accumulated plenty of critics during his career.
His television persona is deliberately confrontational.
His political commentary can be provocative.
His financial advice is frequently delivered without much concern for whether the person hearing it likes the message.
But O’Leary says criticism itself can become another form of noise.
If an opinion does not change his business, investments or objectives, he questions why he should spend energy responding to it.
That does not mean ignoring useful criticism.
It means deciding whether criticism actually contains useful information.
If it doesn’t, O’Leary moves on.
His Career Helps Explain Why He Thinks This Way
O’Leary founded SoftKey in Toronto in 1983.
The business expanded aggressively, eventually becoming The Learning Company before being sold to Mattel in 1999 in a transaction valued at roughly $3.7 billion.
The deal became one of the defining events of O’Leary’s career.
He later moved increasingly into investing and television, eventually becoming one of the best-known personalities on Shark Tank.
That career also included mistakes.
O’Leary readily acknowledges that.
And this is where another part of his philosophy becomes important.
O’Leary Says He Is Not Afraid of Failing
Successful investors frequently appear more certain in retrospect than they actually were when making decisions.
O’Leary rejects that image.
He says he has made plenty of investing mistakes alongside his biggest successes.
What matters, in his view, is ensuring one failure cannot destroy everything else.
His rule is straightforward:
Never bet everything on a single outcome.
That principle sits comfortably alongside his obsession with focus.
Focus intensely on what matters.
But don’t confuse conviction with certainty.
A business can fail.
An investment can collapse.
An entrepreneur can be wrong.
The objective is to survive the mistake.
That Philosophy Is Showing Up in Canada Right Now
O’Leary’s thinking becomes particularly interesting when applied to his recent comments about Canada.
The country is currently dealing with a serious trade confrontation with the United States.
Many investors see uncertainty.
O’Leary sees something potentially more valuable.
He has recently argued that the disruption could create an unusually attractive opportunity to invest in Canadian assets, even describing the potential long-term opportunity as “ridiculously fantastic.”
Again, the principle is similar.
Ignore the noise.
Determine what actually changes the long-term value of an asset.
Then act accordingly.
And Canada Is Trying to Attract Exactly That Kind of Investor
The timing of O’Leary’s argument is particularly interesting.
Prime Minister Mark Carney hosted a major investment summit in Toronto this week, bringing together some of the world’s largest institutional investors.
The government is attempting to attract capital into Canadian mining, energy, infrastructure, technology and data-centre projects as the country tries to reduce its economic dependence on the United States.
More than 160 potential projects representing over C$1 trillion in investment were being presented around the summit.
That overlaps remarkably closely with what O’Leary has been arguing.
Canada has assets.
It has resources.
It has skilled workers.
What it needs is capital willing to look beyond the immediate political uncertainty.
The Difference Between Being Busy and Making Progress
This is ultimately the lesson O’Leary says he learned from Jobs.
Success is not necessarily about doing more.
It is about deciding what deserves attention.
Three meaningful accomplishments can matter more than dozens of emails, meetings and conversations.
The difficult part is identifying those three things.
And then having the discipline to ignore everything attempting to pull you away from them.
Kevin O’Leary’s Rule Is Simple. Following It Isn’t.
There is an obvious danger in O’Leary’s philosophy.
Not everything dismissed as “noise” actually is noise.
Employees can identify problems executives miss.
Customers can reveal weaknesses in products.
Critics can sometimes be right.
Extreme focus becomes dangerous when it turns into an unwillingness to listen.
But that isn’t quite O’Leary’s argument.
His point is about allocation.
Money is finite.
Time is finite.
Attention is finite.
Successful people decide deliberately where each one goes.
And after more than four decades in business, O’Leary says one of the most important lessons he learned came from watching Steve Jobs do exactly that.
Choose the three things that matter today.
Do them first.
Then decide whether everything else deserves your attention at all.
It may sound like a productivity trick.
For Kevin O’Leary, it became something closer to a philosophy for building wealth
